The Future of Ruby

From eqqon

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Introduction)
m (Introduction)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Introduction ==
== Introduction ==
-
Yukihiro Matsumoto's C implementation of Ruby aka '''MRI''' (as time of this writing the stable version of the MRI is Ruby 1.8) is considered the '''Quasi-Standard of the Ruby Language''' because there has never been an explicit language standard for Ruby. As the number of implementations grows a formal standard seems to become necessary to prevent the horror szenario of multiple incompatible interpreters on different platforms.  
+
Yukihiro Matsumoto's C implementation of [[Ruby]] aka '''MRI''' (as time of this writing the stable version of the MRI is Ruby 1.8) is considered the '''Quasi-Standard of the Ruby Language''' because there has never been an explicit language standard for Ruby. As the number of implementations grows a formal standard seems to become necessary to prevent the horror szenario of multiple incompatible interpreters on different platforms.  
There have been some attempts to summarize the language's features but none is complete neither up to date with the current MRI:
There have been some attempts to summarize the language's features but none is complete neither up to date with the current MRI:

Revision as of 08:17, 7 August 2007

Introduction

Yukihiro Matsumoto's C implementation of Ruby aka MRI (as time of this writing the stable version of the MRI is Ruby 1.8) is considered the Quasi-Standard of the Ruby Language because there has never been an explicit language standard for Ruby. As the number of implementations grows a formal standard seems to become necessary to prevent the horror szenario of multiple incompatible interpreters on different platforms.

There have been some attempts to summarize the language's features but none is complete neither up to date with the current MRI:

Ruby Implementations

Currently there are many different implementations of Ruby1.8 which are more or less complete:


Ruby 1.9