Ruby

From eqqon

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→The Future of Ruby)
Line 50: Line 50:
Yukihiro Matsumoto's C implementation of Ruby aka MRI (Version 1.8) is now considered the '''Quasi-Standard of the Ruby Language''' because there has never been an explicit language standard for Ruby. As the number of implementations grows a standard seems to become necessary to prevent the horror szenario of totally incompatible interpreters. [[The Future of Ruby|Read on ...]]
Yukihiro Matsumoto's C implementation of Ruby aka MRI (Version 1.8) is now considered the '''Quasi-Standard of the Ruby Language''' because there has never been an explicit language standard for Ruby. As the number of implementations grows a standard seems to become necessary to prevent the horror szenario of totally incompatible interpreters. [[The Future of Ruby|Read on ...]]
-
Currently there are many different implementations of Ruby1.8 which are more or less complete:
 
-
 
-
=== Ruby 1.9 ===
 
-
* [http://www.davidflanagan.com/blog/2007_08.html#000131 List of differences between 1.8 and 1.9 by David Flanagan]
 
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__

Revision as of 07:40, 6 August 2007

Ruby logo.gif

Extending Ruby in C

We found that the README.ext from Ruby's source distribution is not comfortable to read so we decided to mirror it on our site with proper formatting and some helpful additions: Ruby1.8 extension API.

More Ruby Resources

Community

Different Implementations

  • JRuby A very complete implementation of the interpreter in Java.
  • YARV The site of the virtual machine which has been merged into 1.9.
  • Ruby.NET Still incomplete and unoptimized .NET compiler for Ruby.
  • Rubinious An implementation based loosely on the Smalltalk-80 VM architecture.
  • Iron Ruby This implementation by Microsoft has been presented but not yet released.

Documentation

GUI Toolkit Bindings

The Future of Ruby

Yukihiro Matsumoto's C implementation of Ruby aka MRI (Version 1.8) is now considered the Quasi-Standard of the Ruby Language because there has never been an explicit language standard for Ruby. As the number of implementations grows a standard seems to become necessary to prevent the horror szenario of totally incompatible interpreters. Read on ...



Retrieved from "http://www.eqqon.com/index.php/Ruby"